- Warns possible increase in food expenses
- Says blanket ban could use up more land for alternative oil production
- Argues sustainably sourced palm oil extremely efficient crop
- Palm oil deforestation trending down
The European Palm Oil Alliance (EPOA) in a statement has expressed its grave disappointment caused by the intention of the Sri Lankan Government to ban palm oil.
Stating it was all for growing of sustainable palm oil, EPOA also countered claims on the dangers of palm oil cultivation which influenced the Government decision.
EPOA said a ban on palm oil would most probably increase costs of food for the consumers in Sri Lanka and might mean that much more plantation land would be needed for alternative edible oil production.
“A blanket ban on palm oil production will take away the opportunity of the small producers to grow their own (profitable) products,” EPOA said.It said EPOA was fully committed to promoting the use of sustainable palm oil as the alternative to conventional palm oil. Oil palm is, by far, the most widely-used and most productive oil crop in the world. If produced and sourced sustainably, palm oil can play an important role in providing for the growing global demand for vegetable oil while at the same time playing a key role in supporting the livelihoods of millions of smallholders worldwide as per a study by University of Göttingen.
EPOA said oil palm was an extremely efficient crop, which made the oil widely available and relatively cheap. Palm oil and palm kernel oil together represent 40% of the global vegetable oil production. Palm oil has the highest yield compared to other oil crops per hectare of land.
One hectare of oil palm trees produce on average 3.8 tons of oil each year. Oil palm accounts for 7.4% of all the cultivated land for vegetable oils globally, but has the highest output, producing 39.6% of all oils and fats.
About 73 million tons of palm oil is produced annually. To obtain the same amount of alternative oils, such as soybean or coconut oil, between four and 10 times more land would be required, according to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF).
As for deforestation, this seems to develop in the right direction. The WWF and WRI observe that 2020 is the fourth straight year that palm oil deforestation has been trending down to historical levels.
Palm oil has been used in food preparation for over 5,000 years. Today, it is consumed worldwide as cooking oil, in margarine and shortening. It is also used in fat blends and a vast array of food products. Palm oil is a healthy, affordable cooking oil and source of nutrition for millions of consumers in developing countries. It is also used in many household and personal care products. There is no realistic alternative for palm oil for most of the applications and countries.
Palm oil gives great livelihood opportunities for lots of farmers and also for the Sri Lankan farmers and workers while saving crucial foreign exchange for their country.
A ban on palm oil would most probably increase costs of food for the consumers in Sri Lanka and might mean that much more plantation land is needed for alternative edible oil production. A blanket ban on palm oil production will take away the opportunity of the small producers to grow their own (profitable) products. Will they be able to find a good alternative?
EPOA said it was very much in favour of promoting the growing of sustainable palm oil which would prove to be positive for all involved (including the environment/deforestation, biodiversity and local economies).
“In the text of the recent order we noticed the following sentence as reason for banning palm oil: ‘representations made to the President suggesting that palm oil production is causing soil erosion, drying of springs thus affecting biodiversity and life of the community.
“There are no scientific analyses to back up such claims, because as shown by e.g. the University of Göttingen, Wageningen University and RSPO, palm oil can be produced sustainably. Sri Lanka already proves that by having RSPO certified palm oil production sites and these will also be affected. If existing plantations have to be uprooted and the trees destroyed, this will mean an unprecedented waste of capital, which will not be easy to replace.
“We strongly believe that promoting sustainable production and trade in palm oil, is a much more effective way than introducing a ban as an instrument of protectionism or a non-trade barrier. Any regulatory measures should create a level-playing field for all vegetable oils irrespective of the production area and should not particularly discriminate against palm oil,” EPOA said in its statement.
EPOA also said it was willing to contribute to multi-country scientific research on the impact of palm oil production in Sri Lanka and would propose to lift the ban on sustainably produced palm oil imports at least for the time being.